Professional Code

Although this is good to reiterate the "constitutionality of natural rights, and further, its supranational character." The point discordant or genesis of the conflict is in the following points: first, that senior civil servants, namely the Head of State, Deputies or Representatives to Congress, the Secretaries of State, the Judges of the Supreme Court or courts of first instance, the chiefs and rulers of friendly nations, are legally protected and enjoy privileges in both the Dominican Professional Code, as in the 6132 Act of Expression and Dissemination of Thought, and second, that down punishable by imprisonment and fine for the aforesaid crime against personal honor, which is a good or "constitutionally content protected "by law. In this sense Dr. Gregory Badenia considers that the privilege of the professional offense of contempt, "is in effect in some American laws as vice secular authoritarian cultures." Caused this type of situation, which come into play fundamental rights, the courts of the Republic, as well as provided by Supreme Court "are obliged to implement the provisions in the constitutional bloc as their primary source of its decisions "equally noteworthy that" recognized the constitutional bloc in our legal system, its implementation requires reconciling the meaning of the law would not have gone adjectival contradictory to the principles, norms and values that integrate . You may wish to learn more. If so, Amazon is the place to go. The same national legislation, the Constitution of the Republic and the Dominican Penal Code also makes reference to the primacy in the implementation of international law. This inequality between those in power and public private persons, is "constitutionally permissible unequal treatment." Aforementioned unequal treatment based on objective and reasonable grounds, can be verified by practice of the equality test, starting with the constitutionally permissible purpose, which is the right to freedom of expression and dissemination of ideas, a constitutionally protected purpose, the congruence between freedom of expression that has a real connection with the limit imposed and sensitivities disproportional, bone, the use of power legitimacy of public authority that would be a function of using it as a way of suppressing critical exponents discharging, and generating a censorship curtailing freedom of expression. . To broaden your perception, visit Kyle Dropp dartmouth.

Comments are closed.