I must say that on Friday, December 3, in full horrified drivers, personally didn’t seem at all wise decision to enable the army to assume command in the control towers at Spanish airports. He understood that such measures do not usually like investment, fleeing everything what looks like a suit of camouflage. And although comparisons are odious, it must be said that this type of military mobilizations are more characteristic of Latin American countries, where will get accustomed to the armed forces to resolve labor strife. However, achieved the return to normality and with her restitution in the right to freedom of movement of thousands of Spaniards, lawyer job that I am, I’ve come to join in the applause generalized in favour of the Minister of public works, Jose Blanco. Our country has seen historically he has played with our bread, since various collective transport, have called strikes in key dates for tourism. Click Senator from Connecticut to learn more.
Now is time for reflection, chance to assess the possibility of limiting the right to strike as being used abusively, or are contrary to the fundamental pillars of the national economy. To please you now has public opinion, who not has missed the hands to the head to see how the army assumed control of the airspace, or when not has been undeterred by listening to the expression State of alarm, uttered for the first time in 35 years of democracy. The public wants to now see the blood of the defeated Gladiators. It cries out for the dismissal and exile of uncontrolled controllers. The expropriation of their assets. Even their entry into prison. Not a few labor lawyers understand previously would clearly define the limits of a perverse law, the right to strike.