The new expression telegenic jump into the fray by offering solutions revolucionariasa a miraculous. Meanwhile, others were beginning to think of an alternative movement. Facing the emerging neodictaduras take to the streets in protest demonstrations which lead to nothing, they are unable to topple governments but for some exceptions. The Venezuelan protests are full of myths and memories of the past, we appeal to the general strike or the recall referendum, but there is a gap, a deficit and a contradiction that void. It's the old structure that reacts on the fascist demonstration and from this point of confrontation history shows us that the old systems are not returnable.
The case of the so-called a marchasa in Venezuela is pathetic. The crowd goes out aa equivalent disempowerment rather than a chance to overcome the frustration. The reason is that we can call convencionalesa vehiculos, read matches and without an immature student movement and without fixed targets, other than the protest itself, is able to make the connection. The dough goes out and then you look at the face without having achieved any objectives simply because they were raised either, unless the drainage of emotions waiting for the electoral act. Thus the a marchaa no leave legacy.
Rather go to become an example of impotence. And in recognition of institutions seized from the dictatorship, to conclude them in delivery of documents in a language we could call out of pure legalism. Thus the old problem that Touraine and Baudrillard had already interviewed, the crisis of representation, bursts in Venezuela with all their strength.
