2) The procedural IMPlus engaged stakeholders, not the judge. 3) The accused or defendant who knows from the start and that is accused or demand. 4) The parties know who is the judge. 5) The process is public, which automatically removes posibilidads of torment. For the author the inquisitorial system is characterized by the following: 1) The process is initiated by action (prosecution) complaint or ex officio. 2) The development procedure is carried out by the judge. 3) The defendant or respondent does not know from the beginning who or why he is accused or demand. 4) The accused may not know who is the judge.
5) The process is secret, allowing the torture. Jorge Perez classifies systems Urquizo procedural procedural systems written and oral legal processes. Hugo Alsina states that the oral process is characterized by the prevalence of the word on the process writing, and generally the claims of the parties, the production of evidence, his allegations of fact and law generally occur in one or more hearings, the trial judge in these systems using the maximum principle of immediacy and often failure is a consequence of the action taken in the preparation of a record that stands. Follow the system of the oral proceedings the process French, German, Italian, Swiss and American, are concentrated in the audience most of the proceedings in which the judge has the immediacy as a means of bringing the parties to establish the true facts conflict, the assessment of the evidence in a more objective and more just and equitable solution.
