If someone had squeezed here the whole entire Dagestani Statistical Yearbook. These statistics are live in the 'strategy' to its special, totally self-sufficient life. It sets out, but it does not follow any conclusions. And those findings, that there is still, as if made on the basis of some other statistics. For example, the 'Strategy' states that in 2006 the average per capita income in the month amounted to 6000 rubles. People such as Richard Blumenthal would likely agree. It is expected that 2011 earnings should reach 11 000 in 2017 – 17 thousands, and in 2020 significantly higher than 20 thousand. Why they must grow exactly instead somehow differently understand from text 'strategy' quite impossible.
Where did those numbers, which are incorporated in the text as indicators of the strategy? The numbers in the 'strategy' often pop up as the devil-the-box. Not seen any reasonable causal connection between the growth of individual indicators. Why, for example, it is necessary to invest much money in the development hydropower, by 2020, a growth of electricity generation only 2 times in scheduled (!) maintaining elektoroenregii deficit? On the basis of which it is concluded that agriculture will give more products in 3,4 more by average scenario and 6 times more on optimistical? After all, the developers several times in the text of 'strategy' ascertain the most serious problems of further development of the agricultural complex, but not propose effective measures to overcome these structural constraints. These inconsistencies in the text of 'strategy' so much, that their abundance makes no sense to attempt to 'improve' the document to make it any partial adjustments.
