Should the theories of Breuer be applied to the procedure of how to redirect the attention of those who are enfeebled from the consequences of the symptoms to the scene in which and for which the symptom’s father and, after the indication of the patient removes the symptom set as a result of the reproduction of the traumatic scene (a delayed rectification of the psychical cultural politics back then.) For the study of the traumatic scene was found that produced the symptoms and influences how they did it.
The traumatic scene must satisfy two conditions, the recondite of a hysterical symptom of a traumatic scene only involves a gain in understanding if this scene has fitness and strength determiner traumatic. It sometimes happens that the traumatic scene that spawned the symptom meets these two conditions but with a much higher frequency are carried out one of the three possibilities that are unfavorable for understanding: 1_ The scene which leads the analysis and in which the symptom first appeared is not suitable (safe) to determine the symptom as its content is devoid of any nexus to the nature of this. Either 2_ allegedly traumatic experience, even though they had a nexus of content is be a regular inofenciva impression, which is not usually effective. Or the traumatic scene 3_ us off in both directions and also appearing as inofenciva link lacks the specificity of hysterical symptoms. The concept of hysterical symptoms Breuer: this, following Charcot also argued that experience can be inofenciva trauma and deploy a given force if it affects the particular person in a mental complexion, called hypnoid state.
