W. D. Meyer Law

21 and 22 January the Russian side made statements on the Iranian issue. In the first case, the general director of Rosoboronexport, Anatoly Isaikin in Bahrain, confirmed that Russia continues to supply defensive weapons to Iran according to previously reached bilateral agreements. This, apparently, talking about the S-300 air defense systems because it can not be classified as offensive weapons. In the second case, the head of "Rosatom" Sergey Kiriyenko in his told a news conference that Russia will launch the reactor at Bushehr in Iran this year. Both statements at variance with the "recommendations" of the West. Further recognition came almost sensational to Kurdish sources – from the Iraq Kurdistan. According to the newspaper "Ore", citing a source in the Shiite organization "mihrab", which is run by the High Council of Islam in Iraq and supported by Iran, in recent years a number of Sunni mullahs Kurdistan replaced by the Shiite faith.

One of the mullahs, Said Issa, head of Sulaimaniya branch "mihrab," the newspaper said: "If all the Shiites in the world desist, I will not give. If the Sunni brothers will know what I know, I I am sure they also go into Shiism ". Mullah Isa said that during his visit in the Shia holy cities of Karbala and Najaf, he met with Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the supreme leader of the Shiites, "He (al-Sistani) is not very surprised I moved to Shiism, because there are many people like me, and he sees them every day.

The situation in the North Caucasus is so serious that it called the number one problem of Russia's President in my last message. But even earlier, in Makhachkala, and Stavropol, Dmitry Medvedev announced the first thesis system, rather than spontaneous threats to Russian security, not caused by external and internal factors. Analyzing the root causes of what is happening, you need to remember the message of the President of Russia in 1994, in which Boris Yeltsin acknowledged that "… Russia over the last decade trying to overcome the threat of disintegration of ethno-political processes that generated … inconsistency of the two initially laid the foundation of government Principles of the Russian Federation – the national-territorial and administrative-territorial.

" Recognition that the threat to Russian security is inherent in the structure of the state, was confirmed after several months. The war between the Centre and the laws of the federation, when Chechnya and Tatarstan did not sign the federal treaty, has been skillfully used by economic lobbies in the Russian leadership. Under the information veil that filled the media in connection with full-scale hostilities in Chechnya in 1995-96. were privatized all the largest domestic oil and gas facilities. As a result of the second Chechen campaign, Russia managed to maintain their integrity only the efforts of the second President of the Russian Federation. Doubt that the modern Russian state is enough resilience to withstand the aggravation of ethnic and religious contradictions in the approaches to the election of the fourth president of Russia makes us look for recipes in most of Russian history.

For all, even the most unpretentious of politicians, one is absolutely clear – this form of security solutions and cooperation among states has become obsolete entirely. For politicians it was clearly a long time, summits were not already for quite some time, due to significant costs for them in conjunction with the complete absence of any practical results, and no one blatant difference of opinion after all 56 states of Eurasia and the Atlantic. In general, the "image" from the summit of its formality confirms, during performances always someone walking between the rows, according to present performances no one "does not concerned and do not touch "in the statements a" water "or non-binding calls such as" oil oily "boredom on their faces, the attributes of" duty "activities and not less" on duty "phrase Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who called "To develop democratic freedoms." You can not seriously talk about the mythical sentence, Mr. President of Kazakhstan on the introduction of the new world currency (not to m. li), in cases where the welfare of the world's leading powers is the U.S. dollar.

Why should the U.S. be clearly economically unjustified support for a similar proposal. Even Europe, trying to formally withdraw from the dollar area with their euros, can not feel the full extent themselves in this regard still. Dollar prevails and dominates all the currencies of other states, and his status is quite natural and is actively supported by all the economic institutions of the United States, as tool for the relative stability of the economy of this state.

However, depending on the level of society, of one's own needs and level of knowledge people display the political world, with varying degrees of depth and in different forms, in particular in the form of myths, ideologies, religious and scientific beliefs. Centuries of human history crystallized three main ways (forms) of human comprehension of the world of politics. At the everyday level of knowledge the average citizen, "a man with street "is armed with one primary, the background image policy, which allows it to adapt to an organized political community, to find compatible with their own relationship with the objectives of ways authority and the state. (Source: Kenneth Yarrow). Formed at this level of consciousness the image of politics is essentially a result of its factual contemplation, not applying for a specialized relation to it or use techniques of reflection, beyond the usual observations of reality. Everyday consciousness draws a "natural" picture of the policy based on individual empirical experience and traditionally established ideas customs, stereotypes. In fact, this type of political contemplation is a kind of no logical and intuitive-imaginative thinking, which is dominated by feelings and emotions expressed in a variety of characters, associations, metaphors and other simple ways to express human thought. Along with rational assessments here in abundance and there are various neotrefleksirovannye, irrational views. It is this type of thinking creates all sorts of myths, utopias, beliefs, and other similar forms of thought about politics. As to the meaning of such a summative way policy, it is most often associated with the phenomena of power, state leadership, management, some purposeful activity.

The ups and downs of the Armenian-Turkish rapprochement, to some extent overshadowed the far more serious regional problem that exists, however, is not the first – the West’s intention to completely subjugate Iran and, accordingly, Iran’s unwillingness to concede in the struggle for their independence. Of course, a powerful neighbor South Caucasus is not simply opposed to the Western desire to regain control of Iranian energy sources, acting in favor of and under the dictates of Israel and its influential Jewish lobby in the U.S., but still tries to assert to the world their particular situation – and in our region and throughout the Middle East, and in the Muslim world. Unlikely need to be reminded that in the past about 8-9 years as a major cause “discontent” Iran U.S. and Israel have imposed and the international community to impose the idea that the alleged Tehran for its active promotion of the technologies Nuclear energy covers the desire to acquire nuclear weapons. So recently the new U.S. Secretary of State Jewish Hillary Clinton has once again confirmed that the change from a party in power in Washington, nothing in this country and in the minds of the elites is not changing, literally shouting to the whole world: “Iran has no right to possess nuclear weapons.” Actually, why – no? Shawky pro-American in the Muslim world, Pakistan, such as “may”..