Democratic Rule

Citizen-Politician, in the quality of governor, considering here the legislative offices, executive, fiscalizadora and of official representation of an agency of institucional sovereignty and/or, eticamente analyzed its actuao, he does not have to want exactly for itself what the majority of the population does not have, that for previous law and/or for the acquired right calls, can usufruct a good, a same benefit or a legitimate and legal right, if its fellow citizen does not have such rights and/or privileges. In a Democratic Rule of law, no group or server of the State and/or institutions intervencionadas for the State, can legislate and benefit of done and approved legislation, especially, for this group or server, if the remaining members of the population do not usufruct of equal rights and chances, because: ' ' Who becomes prince (it is read governing, leading public, aside remark ours) by means of the favor of the people, must remain its friend, what it is very easy, a time that this only desires not to be oppressed. But who if to become prince against the popular opinion, please of the great ones, must, before more nothing, to look for to conquer povo.' ' (MACHIAVELLI, s.d.: 53) Reflectindo, more deeply, on the stratification of the society, this can be boarded in two great parallel blocks: public sector and private sector. It can be considered offensive and harmful of the national interests, all and any measure that it aims at to discriminate, for the privilege, one determined individual, group, company or professional institution, creating the beneficiary elites of good, services and attentions, to the cost of the majority of the citizens who, with very effort, integrally fulfill its duties of citizenship. Another one in such a way will not be considered, as for the private sector, which if recognizes the privileged existence of individuals, groups and elites, since whom they get such statute to its proper one costs, that is, since that this sector does not receive only cntimo or benefits, proceeding from the contributions of the citizens, by the way, nor the State if must interfere in prescribed the private initiative, excepto, to fiscalize and to charge the which had taxes, without any discriminations and privileges in relation to the too much citizens, because of the opposite, would be deeply unjust that the State protected the private sector to the cost of the sacrifices of the workers. .

Comments are closed.